IMDb 0 2023 HD

Schists 2023

Schists 2023

2023
6 min
0 IMDB

Could not find a full copy of Schist so I uploaded this, an extended and manipulated version to celebrate the beginning of a 2023 full of holes and…

Personnel // Cast & Crew

Director Dirk de Bruyn

How Viewers Describe This Film

Common themes and sentiments

experimental abstract manipulated textured fractured challenging visual deconstructed unique dense avant-garde raw

Reviews

C
Clara Davies
Mar 20, 2026
2.5 / 5
2.5

'Schists 2023' is an audacious experiment, but one that teeters on the edge of self-indulgence. The concept of an 'extended and manipulated version' with intentional 'holes and gaps' is intriguing, suggesting a deconstruction of narrative. The director's process…

A
Arthur Pendelton
Mar 20, 2026
3.0 / 5
3.0

Viewing 'Schists 2023' is akin to peering through a kaleidoscope that has been deliberately broken and reassembled. The director's decision to embrace 'holes and gaps' and then bombard the film with physical elements—plastic, slides, letraset—through an optical printer…

I
Isobel Thorne
Mar 20, 2026
4.0 / 5
4.0

This is cinema as pure texture, a defiant act of cinematic archaeology. 'Schists 2023' takes an existing film, carves it up, and then reassembles it with a visceral, almost punk rock energy. The optical printer is used not…

M
Marcus Bellweather
Mar 20, 2026
2.0 / 5
2.0

'Schists 2023' presents itself as an experiment in cinematic decay and reconstruction. The premise of an 'extended and manipulated version' with added 'holes and gaps' is intriguing, but the execution feels more like an academic exercise than a…

E
Eleanor Vance
Mar 20, 2026
3.5 / 5
3.5

In 'Schists 2023', the director has crafted a fascinatingly fractured artefact. This isn't a film to be passively consumed; it demands engagement with its very fabric. The deliberate introduction of 'holes and gaps' and the subsequent physical manipulation…

FAQs

'Schists 2023' is unlikely to appeal to a general audience seeking conventional entertainment. Its description points to a highly experimental and abstract approach, involving manipulated footage and the insertion of physical detritus. This suggests a film that prioritises visual texture and conceptual exploration over narrative accessibility. It is more suited to viewers interested in avant-garde cinema, experimental art, and the deconstruction of film as a medium.